Dasein Reprogrammed: A Shift From Heideggerian Being To Designed Human

Crossmark status

Authors

  • Ruttab Irfan University of the Punjab Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65105/2025jvp-0301-46

Keywords:

Dasein , Transhumanism, Technology, Heidegger, Being-in-the-world, Superhuman, Existential Crisis, Man-Techno relationship

Abstract

In the current technological world, human beings are confronting the technologies of all time and clime, so they are experiencing reality through the lens of technology. Dasein, being-in-the-world of Heidegger, is losing its interconnectedness with the world as technology is bridging the relation of being and the world. Heidegger raises the question about the essence of technology, which is threatening to the essence of man; therefore, a reflective approach to this problem is inevitable. Now, with the rising concept of Transhumanism, there is no gateway to escape without addressing this existential crisis. This is the crucial time to contemplate the man-techno relationship, as the technology, which is always trying to master human beings, is now ready to make humans devoid of human qualities, emotions, and even individuality. There is also a need to deal with the technological factors that are continuously changing the definition of being human, as Transhumanists have their own optimistic definition of being human, which is the enhancement of human beings by their alteration with the help of technology, which makes them Transhuman or Superhuman, but not the Being-in-the-world. The intrinsic presence of technology in human beings is eliminating the way of its beingness by making it a by-product of technology.

References

Falcon, A. (2005). Aristotle on causality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2005 Edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-causality/

Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G.-J., & van de Poel, I. (2018). Philosophy of technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/technology/

Hansell, G. R., & Grassie, W. (Eds.). (2011). H+/-: Transhumanism and its critics. Xlibris Corporation.

Heidegger, M. (1971). Building Dwelling Thinking (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). In Poetry, language, thought. Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Garland Publishing.

Heidegger, M. (1977b). The turning (W. Lovitt, Trans., pp. 36–49). In The question concerning technology. Garland Publishing.

Huxley, J. (1957). New bottles for new wine. Chatto & Windus.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin Publishing Group.

Marsen, S. (2011). Playing by the rules—or not? Constructions of identity in a posthuman future. In G. R. Hansell & W. Grassie (Eds.), H+/-: Transhumanism and its critics (pp. 86–88). Xlibris Corporation.

Metanexus. (2025, February 26). H-: Engaging transhumanism: A critical historical perspective – Metanexus. https://metanexus.net/h-engaging-transhumanism-critical-historical-perspective/

Peters, T. (2006). Anticipating Omega: Science, faith, and our ultimate future. V&R Academic.

Pinker, S. (1994). Chapter 2: An instinct to learn. In The language instinct. https://stanford.edu/~hakuta/www/archives/syllabi/Courses/Ed232(Learning)/pinker_s01.htm

Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage Books.

Steigler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century (D. Ross, Trans.). Polity Press.

The Presbyterian Outlook. (2017, May 16). Practicing Sabbath in the digital age. https://pres-outlook.org/2017/05/practicing-sabbath-digital-age/

Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2011). Engaging transhumanism. In G. R. Hansell & W. Grassie (Eds.), H+/-: Transhumanism and its critics (pp. 19–42). Xlibris Corporation.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

Irfan, R. (2025). Dasein Reprogrammed: A Shift From Heideggerian Being To Designed Human. Journal of Visionary Philosophers, 3(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.65105/2025jvp-0301-46

Similar Articles

1-10 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.